Many academics see e-learning as "expensive and time-consuming", a survey has found.
About half of university staff polled believe that learning technologies are popular with students but only a small proportion of academics are embracing them.
In the survey of 125 university staff conducted by IMC (UK) Learning Ltd, a learning technology company, just 14 per cent of respondents recorded lectures and made them available online, per cent thought that e-learning saved money and 18 per cent thought it saved time for teaching staff.
One respondent, an external examiner for a university that offers distance learning, said e-learning technologies required just as much effort as face-to-face teaching. "I don't believe that simply making a DVD of a talk-and-chalk lecture is satisfactory," he added.
色盒直播
Another said: "It takes much, much longer to create high-quality e-learning material than to prepare for a traditional form of teaching to achieve the same level of learning and outcome."
Other respondents emphasised the importance of personal interactions for learning.
色盒直播
Because of its limitations in this respect, e-learning was "at best a supplement to traditional teaching", one academic said.
"E-learning is not as good as face-to-face interaction, but it is sometimes a necessity, in which case we always try to do it as well as we can. It therefore takes quite a bit of effort, and it is never our intention to use e-learning to save the educational efforts of academics," another respondent said.
There was also concern about the fact that "students are increasingly expecting e-learning resources to be sufficient for their needs. As a result, they are losing the skills of note-taking as well as of listening to and concentrating throughout 50-minute lectures."
Many respondents expressed worry about lectures being routinely made available online: "This leads to poor lecture attendance and we then observe cramming for exams at far too late a stage," one said.
色盒直播
Despite their reservations, other respondents said that e-learning had benefits, although many academics emphasised that it should never be considered as a "cost-cutting" tool.
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login