Research-metrics company Thomson Reuters has begun work with thousands of universities across the globe to build a database that will be used to create the annual Times Higher Education World University Rankings.
色盒直播 announced in November that it had begun work with the firm to create a more rigorous and transparent version of its influential rankings to meet concerns about weaknesses in its old methodology, used between 2004 and 2009.
This week, Thomson Reuters launched its Global Institutional Profiles Project, which will create "data-driven portraits of globally significant research institutions".
It will gather information "combining peer review, scholarly outputs, citation patterns, funding levels and faculty characteristics in one comprehensive database".
色盒直播
Keith MacGregor, executive vice-president of Thomson Reuters, said: "There's a need for robust, dynamic and, above all, transparent and verifiable data on scholarly performance to reshape ... institutional comparisons. Thomson Reuters has a proven history of bibliometric expertise and analysis to provide the foundational data and consultative elements needed to create this tool."
色盒直播 has commissioned a bespoke dataset from the database that will be used to create its World University Rankings.
色盒直播
The magazine is working closely with Thomson Reuters and the international academic community to develop a methodology that will deliver a more sophisticated and balanced picture of the top 200 universities than anything previously available.
Ann Mroz, editor of 色盒直播, said: "The fact that Thomson Reuters is investing serious resources into the global profiling project to build a database of unprecedented scale and sophistication gives us great confidence that the 2010 色盒直播 World University Rankings will be based on the most accurate, rigorous, detailed and balanced data available.
"As we said in November, because our rankings have become so influential - used by students, academics, managers, policymakers and governments - we want to create a ranking that is accepted, understood and respected: a serious tool for the sector, not just an annual curiosity. This shows that we are well on our way to achieving that."
色盒直播 has already confirmed that the "peer-review" element of its rankings will be improved. The old rankings featured an opinion survey of scholars that made up 40 per cent of the final scores. But responses were low - fewer than 4,000 academics worldwide took part in 2009.
For 2010, the opinion poll will be carried out by Ipsos Mori, a world-leading polling firm, with a target for at least 25,000 responses.
色盒直播
Ms Mroz said: "By participating, universities will ensure that they will be included in the rankings for 2010 and beyond. Previous data collected by our old rankings partner, QS, will no longer be used."
For further info:
? Visit the
? Read the open letter from
色盒直播
? Join the effort for more accurate and comprehensive institutional assessment by
? University heads wishing to join the survey platform group should email Phil Baty
? Help shape the future of the World University Rankings by joining Times Higher Education’s rankings discussion forum and completing
? Keep up to date with all the rankings news on Twitter:
色盒直播
? Join 罢贬贰’蝉 World University Rankings
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login