I would like to respond to David Head's suggestion that the Higher Education Funding Council for England has been inconsistent in its approach to the development of modern languages (Letters, 色盒直播S , April ).
The letter I wrote in December 1999 to the heads of all HE institutions providing languages teaching was in response to declining recruitment trends and the fact universities and colleges were scaling down provision.
All these institutions are free to make decisions about the courses they offer. Our concern is that they should not work in isolation but develop programmes in the light of subject provision available at other institutions regionally and nationally. If everyone scales down provision in reaction to data, there is a risk of undersupply.
My letter was to encourage institutions to collaborate. The Universities Council on Modern Languages responded positively, and we are working on a range of schemes designed to encourage collaboration and to support modern foreign languages. None of this is dirigiste . It supports sensible planning while respecting institutional autonomy.
Brian Fender
Chief executive
Higher Education Funding Council for England
Register to continue
Why register?
- Registration is free and only takes a moment
- Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
- Sign up for our newsletter
Subscribe
Or subscribe for unlimited access to:
- Unlimited access to news, views, insights & reviews
- Digital editions
- Digital access to 罢贬贰’蝉 university and college rankings analysis
Already registered or a current subscriber? Login