É«ºÐÖ±²¥

In response to Aileen Fyfe¡¯s comments, there is an example of a scientific journal successfully forgoing large profits (¡°Publish and be poor: journals shouldn¡¯t just be about money¡±, Opinion, 9 April).

For a few years, the International Society for Computational Biology had only one official journal: Plos Computational Biology. This journal has always been fully open access. The society has since reaffiliated itself with a ¡°hybrid¡± journal (Bioinformatics), while maintaining the affiliation with Plos Computational Biology.

However, those few years for which Plos Computational Biology was the society¡¯s only official journal demonstrate that a large learned society can function with just an open access journal. (The publisher, Plos, has always been open to requests for publication-charge waivers for those authors who cannot afford the cost ¨C this is also very important.) Money was presumably made through membership fees and conference attendance fees, for example.

Since it appears feasible for a learned society to run without charging for its journal, it would be good to see larger numbers of societies experimenting with the approach.

Daniel Barker
Via timeshighereducation.co.uk